HyperLiquid faced a ‘tough situation’: Blockworks Research

Blockworks Research analyst Boccaccio explains the HyperLiquid controversy and why they need to adjust risk and margin

article-image

Blockworks Research Analyst Boccaccio | DAS 2025 New York by Mike Lawrence for Blockworks

share

This is a segment from the Empire newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


Let’s talk about HyperLiquid. 

To recap: A trader took out a relatively large short position on JELLY, then, when the short position was liquidated, HyperLiquid’s vault, HLP, took on the position to wind it down. That’s according to Blockworks Research Analyst Boccaccio.

However, JELLY kept rising, which led to the HLP taking losses, so the team overrode the oracle price — a controversial move — and closed the position. 

The choice to shut the position was perhaps a wise one, despite the controversy. Because then both OKX and Binance listed JELLY futures — a move that Boccaccio called “shady.” While we don’t know exactly what the motives were to list the futures, it was clear that HyperLiquid was struggling at the time, and this context “made it seem like an attack on HyperLiquid.”

“Notably, HyperLiquid is the only DEX that has been able to compete with CEX volumes,” Boccaccio told me. 

Loading Tweet..

We’re not going to get too into the weeds about the DEX vs. CEX debate or some of the other controversy that’s arisen since, though I know my colleagues at 0xResearch have been closely following this. 

However, the nuance of the situation is pretty important.

“All positions on Hyperliquid are onchain (unlike some other DEXs). The oracle price being overriden was decided by the validator set. This was clearly a nuanced situation, so the team had to take some serious, and potentially controversial action (even though it was decided by the validator),” Boccaccio noted.

“It’s a tough situation: Either let people lose money in the HLP and erode confidence, or close somebody’s position by overriding the oracle price. I think, to an extent, you want your money in a semi-controlled environment, where there aren’t nefarious actors taking advantage of the situation at the expense of your funds/users.”

So, HyperLiquid and HLP will need to adjust both the risk and margin moving forward to try to prevent another similar situation, Boccaccio said. 

But is it anything like what happened at FTX, like BitGet’s Gracy Chen tried to claim? Let’s not kid ourselves.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Upcoming Events

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research

article-image

Airlines defend their rewards moat, Binance courts favor over breakfast, DAT fees pile up and systematic thinking

article-image

ETF flows slow, REV stagnates, Pump strikes back and Drift punches up

article-image

We’re beginning to price in the chance of not just a 25 basis point cut, but a 50 bps one

article-image

Does Circle’s Arc threaten Ethereum’s “stablecoin chain” moat, or does EVM gravity pull flows back anyway?

article-image

Tech giant’s part in long-term HPC agreement gives it “more financial certainty” than other deals, consulting firm exec argues

article-image

The new SVM chain Zink uses zk tech and promises universal account profiles