Why value accrual matters for tokens

Based on Blockworks Research estimates, JUP buybacks comes up to ~40% of total supply

article-image

CryptoFX/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share


This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


When crypto projects make big announcements using words like “buyback,” “burn,” or “revenue sharing,” that’s usually taken to mean there are bullish investing tailwinds at play.

But I have questions. How much does an annualized 10% buyback yield actually matter when these tokens can plummet 20% in a day?

Does value accrual matter because it is valuable for reasons of fundamental analysis (i.e. cash flows), or merely for narrative optics? 

Over the weekend, Solana DEX aggregator Jupiter announced a significant JUP buyback program with 50% of fee revenues.

Based on estimates by Blockworks Research analyst Carlos Gonzalez, that translates to about $750 million in annualized JUP buybacks, or about a significant 40% of JUP’s circulating supply in a year.

Source: Blockworks Research

That’s a pretty impressive annualized buyback yield of about 42%. 

But what does 42% matter when token prices can tank 90% in a week?

Well, it’s not a flash in the pan solution, but it helps to sustain against selling pressure. Carlos pointed to Raydium’s successful experiment with buybacks:

“Raydium has accumulated 20% of RAY’s supply since the start of their buyback program. In terms of market structure, it adds buying pressure to the token and RAY has outperformed most of Solana DeFi. Fundamentals matter but of course you could also find examples to argue that buybacks aren’t that bullish. For instance, Maker.”

Virtuals, the leading AI agent launchpad on Base (now expanding to Solana), also committed two weeks ago to an estimated $40 million in buybacks and burns for 10k+ agent tokens over a 30-day TWAP. 

Since the buybacks were announced on Jan. 15, the five largest agent token buybacks by far are GAME, CONVO, AIXBT, SEKOIA and MISATO, all of which have given up all their gains as of yesterday’s market crash.

Over the last year, many blue-chip DeFi protocols with actual product-market fit have also sought to return revenues to token holders.

Compound, for instance, proposed in August a fee switch to allocate 30% of its reserves to COMP stakers.

Marc Zeller of Aave proposed last July a “Buy & Distribute” proposal to buy back AAVE on the open market with “net excess revenue of the protocol.”

Then there’s Uniswap, which planned to implement a UNI fee switch for stakers, but quickly abandoned the proposal after receiving an SEC Wells notice two months later (Uniswap is again attempting some form of value accrual on its upcoming Unichain).

Major L2s like Arbitrum, Starknet and Gnosis have floated proposals last year to return value to token holders who stake their tokens.

Starknet voted last September to enable Starknet staking (12.94% APY) and Gnosis passed a proposal in June to spend $30 million of the DAO’s treasury to buy back liquid GNO over a six-month period.

As far as I can tell, out of all the above-mentioned value accrual proposals, only Starknet and Gnosis have actually implemented their value accretive mechanisms.

Yet from the time these value accrual mechanisms were put in place, GNO has seen a 46% decline, while STRK has stayed flat.

So what are the right mental models to think about value accrual mechanisms? They’re not a magic bullet. But they’re a key ingredient in the recipe of getting a successful token launch right.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

  • Blockworks Daily: The newsletter that helps thousands of investors understand crypto and the markets, by Byron Gilliam.
  • Empire: Start your day with top crypto insights from David Canellis and Katherine Ross.
  • Forward Guidance: Explore the growing intersection between crypto, macroeconomics, policy and finance with Ben Strack, Casey Wagner and Felix Jauvin.
  • 0xResearch: Get alpha directly in your inbox — market highlights, charts, degen trade ideas, governance updates, and more.
  • Lightspeed: All things Solana, in your inbox, every day from Jack Kubinec and Jeff Albus.
  • The Drop: The newsletter for crypto collectors and traders, covering games, tokens, apps, memes and more.
Tags

Upcoming Events

Javits Center North | 445 11th Ave

Tues - Thurs, March 18 - 20, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Industry City | Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

recent research

Research

article-image

Dive into crypto’s “application layer” with Kate Irwin everyday at 12:30 pm EST

article-image

The market’s short-lived rally isn’t something to be too worried about, analysts say

article-image

The moves that embodied Solana’s transition to “the people’s chain”

article-image

The summit’s agenda has not been released, but the crypto stockpile and stablecoin legislation are likely to take center stage

article-image

The reveal was a sign of how quickly a pro-crypto regime can get the market to turn: eToro market analyst

article-image

Ethereum Foundation shakes up leadership as internal rifts settle